码迷,mamicode.com
首页 > 移动开发 > 详细

android binder 机制 (ServiceManager)

时间:2014-07-16 08:46:50      阅读:531      评论:0      收藏:0      [点我收藏+]

标签:android   binder   service manager   binder机制   ipc   

Binder机制作为一种IPC通信机制,在android系统中扮演了非常重要的角色,因此我也花了一些时间来研究它,按照我的理解,下面我将从4个方面来讲一下Binder,如有不对的地方,还希望大家多多指教。下面的例子都将以MediaServer来讲。

一、ServiceManager

ServiceManager在Binder系统中相当与DNS,Server会先在这里注册,然后Client会在这里查询服务以获得与Service所在的Server进程建立通信的通路。

在与ServiceManager的通信中,书上是以addService为例来讲,我这里将以getService为例来讲。直接上代码。

/*static*/const sp<IMediaPlayerService>&
IMediaDeathNotifier::getMediaPlayerService()
{
    ALOGV("getMediaPlayerService");
    Mutex::Autolock _l(sServiceLock);
    if (sMediaPlayerService == 0) {
        sp<IServiceManager> sm = defaultServiceManager();
        sp<IBinder> binder;
        do {
            binder = sm->getService(String16("media.player"));
            if (binder != 0) {
                break;
            }
            ALOGW("Media player service not published, waiting...");
            usleep(500000); // 0.5 s
        } while (true);

        if (sDeathNotifier == NULL) {
            sDeathNotifier = new DeathNotifier();
        }
        binder->linkToDeath(sDeathNotifier);
        sMediaPlayerService = interface_cast<IMediaPlayerService>(binder);
    }
    ALOGE_IF(sMediaPlayerService == 0, "no media player service!?");
    return sMediaPlayerService;
}

首先我们来看defaultServiceManager(),这是一个单例模式,实现如下:

sp<IServiceManager> defaultServiceManager() {
    if (gDefaultServiceManager != NULL) return gDefaultServiceManager;
    
    {
        AutoMutex _l(gDefaultServiceManagerLock);
        while (gDefaultServiceManager == NULL) {
            gDefaultServiceManager = interface_cast<IServiceManager>(
                ProcessState::self()->getContextObject(NULL));
            if (gDefaultServiceManager == NULL)
                sleep(1);
        }
    }
    
    return gDefaultServiceManager;
}

其中,ProcessState::self()->getContextObject(NULL)会返回一个BpBinder(0),那么就有:

       gDefaultServiceManager = interface_cast<IServiceManager>(BpBinder(0));

根据interface_cast的定义,就变成了:

       gDefaultServiceManager =BpServiceManager(BpBinder(0));

接下来看下面这句话的实现:

binder = sm->getService(String16("media.player"));

       由前面的分析,sm为BpServiceManager的实例,我们直接到IserviceManager.cpp里面找到BpServiceManager的实现,并找到getService方法,其核心实现调用了checkService方法,实现如下:


virtual sp<IBinder> checkService( const String16& name) const
{
     Parcel data, reply;
     data.writeInterfaceToken(IServiceManager::getInterfaceDescriptor());
     data.writeString16(name);
     remote()->transact(CHECK_SERVICE_TRANSACTION, data, &reply);
     return reply.readStrongBinder();
}

这里,我们会有一个疑问:remote()返回什么。

       先看BpServiceManager的定义:

classBpServiceManager : public BpInterface<IServiceManager>

      

template<typenameINTERFACE>

classBpInterface : public INTERFACE, public BpRefBase

把模板替换一下,变成

classBpInterface : public IServiceManager, public BpRefBase

OK,在BpRefBase里面找到了remote()的定义:

inline IBinder* remote(){ return mRemote; }

 

mRemote什么时候赋值的呢?我们再来看BpServiceManager的构造函数:

BpServiceManager(const sp<IBinder>& impl)
        : BpInterface<IServiceManager>(impl)
{
}
inline BpInterface<INTERFACE>::BpInterface(const sp<IBinder>& remote)
    : BpRefBase(remote)
{
}
BpRefBase::BpRefBase(const sp<IBinder>& o)
    : mRemote(o.get()), mRefs(NULL), mState(0)
{
    extendObjectLifetime(OBJECT_LIFETIME_WEAK);

    if (mRemote) {
        mRemote->incStrong(this);           // Removed on first IncStrong().
        mRefs = mRemote->createWeak(this);  // Held for our entire lifetime.
    }
}
至此,我们就可以知道remote()返回的是之前创建的BpBinder对象BpBinder(0)。那么remote()->transact()实际上就是调用了BpBinder的transact方法。我们跳到BpBinder里面,来看看transact的实现:
status_t BpBinder::transact(
    uint32_t code, const Parcel& data, Parcel* reply, uint32_t flags)
{
    // Once a binder has died, it will never come back to life.
    if (mAlive) {
        status_t status = IPCThreadState::self()->transact(
            mHandle, code, data, reply, flags);
        if (status == DEAD_OBJECT) mAlive = 0;
        return status;
    }

    return DEAD_OBJECT;
}
它把工作都交给IPCThreadState来做了。IPCThreadState是什么呢?它就是Binder传输数据中真正干活的伙计,每个线程都有一个IPCThreadState,每个IPCThreadState中都有一个mIn,一个mOut,其中,mIn用来接收来自Binder设备的数据,mOut用来存储发往Binder设备的数据。OK,我们继续跳到IPCThreadState里面来。

status_t IPCThreadState::transact(int32_t handle,
                                  uint32_t code, const Parcel& data,
                                  Parcel* reply, uint32_t flags)
{
    status_t err = data.errorCheck();
    flags |= TF_ACCEPT_FDS;
	……
	err = writeTransactionData(BC_TRANSACTION, flags, handle, code, data, NULL);
	……
	err = waitForResponse(reply);
	……
	return err;
}

status_t IPCThreadState::writeTransactionData(int32_t cmd, uint32_t binderFlags,
    int32_t handle, uint32_t code, const Parcel& data, status_t* statusBuffer)
{
    binder_transaction_data tr;

    tr.target.handle = handle;
    tr.code = code;
    tr.flags = binderFlags;
    tr.cookie = 0;
    tr.sender_pid = 0;
    tr.sender_euid = 0;
    
    const status_t err = data.errorCheck();
    if (err == NO_ERROR) {
        tr.data_size = data.ipcDataSize();
        tr.data.ptr.buffer = data.ipcData();
        tr.offsets_size = data.ipcObjectsCount()*sizeof(size_t);
        tr.data.ptr.offsets = data.ipcObjects();
    } else if (statusBuffer) {
        tr.flags |= TF_STATUS_CODE;
        *statusBuffer = err;
        tr.data_size = sizeof(status_t);
        tr.data.ptr.buffer = statusBuffer;
        tr.offsets_size = 0;
        tr.data.ptr.offsets = NULL;
    } else {
        return (mLastError = err);
    }
    
    mOut.writeInt32(cmd);
    mOut.write(&tr, sizeof(tr));
    
    return NO_ERROR;
}
writeTransactionData仅仅是把数据写到了mOut里面等待发送给Binder,接下来就waitForResponse。

status_t IPCThreadState::waitForResponse(Parcel *reply, status_t *acquireResult)
{
    int32_t cmd;
    int32_t err;

    while (1) {
        if ((err=talkWithDriver()) < NO_ERROR) break;
        err = mIn.errorCheck();
        if (err < NO_ERROR) break;
        if (mIn.dataAvail() == 0) continue;
        
        cmd = mIn.readInt32();
        
        switch (cmd) {
        …
        case BR_REPLY:
            {
                binder_transaction_data tr;
                err = mIn.read(&tr, sizeof(tr));
                if (err != NO_ERROR) goto finish;
                if (reply) {
                    if ((tr.flags & TF_STATUS_CODE) == 0) {
                        reply->ipcSetDataReference(
                            reinterpret_cast<const uint8_t*>(tr.data.ptr.buffer),
                            tr.data_size,
                            reinterpret_cast<const size_t*>(tr.data.ptr.offsets),
                            tr.offsets_size/sizeof(size_t),
                            freeBuffer, this);
                    } else {
                        err = *static_cast<const status_t*>(tr.data.ptr.buffer);
                        freeBuffer(NULL,
                            reinterpret_cast<const uint8_t*>(tr.data.ptr.buffer),
                            tr.data_size,
                            reinterpret_cast<const size_t*>(tr.data.ptr.offsets),
                            tr.offsets_size/sizeof(size_t), this);
                    }
                } else {
                    freeBuffer(NULL,
                        reinterpret_cast<const uint8_t*>(tr.data.ptr.buffer),
                        tr.data_size,
                        reinterpret_cast<const size_t*>(tr.data.ptr.offsets),
                        tr.offsets_size/sizeof(size_t), this);
                    continue;
                }
            }
            goto finish;
        ……

        default:
            err = executeCommand(cmd);
            if (err != NO_ERROR) goto finish;
            break;
        }
    }

finish:
    if (err != NO_ERROR) {
        if (acquireResult) *acquireResult = err;
        if (reply) reply->setError(err);
        mLastError = err;
    }
    
    return err;
}
看,它在不停的talkWithDriver,看字面意思,应该是在这个函数里面操作了Binder驱动,让我们一探究竟吧。

status_t IPCThreadState::talkWithDriver(bool doReceive)
{
    if (mProcess->mDriverFD <= 0) {
        return -EBADF;
    }
    
    binder_write_read bwr;
    
    // Is the read buffer empty?
    const bool needRead = mIn.dataPosition() >= mIn.dataSize();
    
    // We don't want to write anything if we are still reading
    // from data left in the input buffer and the caller
    // has requested to read the next data.
    const size_t outAvail = (!doReceive || needRead) ? mOut.dataSize() : 0;
    
    bwr.write_size = outAvail;
    bwr.write_buffer = (long unsigned int)mOut.data();

    // This is what we'll read.
    if (doReceive && needRead) {
        bwr.read_size = mIn.dataCapacity();
        bwr.read_buffer = (long unsigned int)mIn.data();
    } else {
        bwr.read_size = 0;
        bwr.read_buffer = 0;
    }
    
    // Return immediately if there is nothing to do.
    if ((bwr.write_size == 0) && (bwr.read_size == 0)) return NO_ERROR;

    bwr.write_consumed = 0;
    bwr.read_consumed = 0;
    status_t err;
    do {
        if (ioctl(mProcess->mDriverFD, BINDER_WRITE_READ, &bwr) >= 0)
            err = NO_ERROR;
        else
            err = -errno;

        if (mProcess->mDriverFD <= 0) {
            err = -EBADF;
        }
    } while (err == -EINTR);

    if (err >= NO_ERROR) {
        if (bwr.write_consumed > 0) {
            if (bwr.write_consumed < (ssize_t)mOut.dataSize())
                mOut.remove(0, bwr.write_consumed);
            else
                mOut.setDataSize(0);
        }
        if (bwr.read_consumed > 0) {
            mIn.setDataSize(bwr.read_consumed);
            mIn.setDataPosition(0);
        }
        return NO_ERROR;
    }
    
    return err;
}

在talkWithDriver中,IPCThreadState不断的写和读取Binder驱动,于是首先writeTransactionData中mOut中准备的数据被写到了Binder驱动,之后,便开始等待Binder中有新的数据出现,谁会往里面写数据呢?应该是目标进程才对,且让我们来看一下这部分是怎么实现的吧。

在Binder IPC通信过程中,进程间通信都要先通过向Binder驱动发送BC_XXX命令,然后Binder 驱动稍做处理后通过对应的BR_XXX将命令转给给目标进程。

如果有返回值,进程也是先将返回结果以BC_REPLY的形式先发给Binder驱动,然后通过驱动以BR_REPLY命令转发。


bubuko.com,布布扣

Binder1往Driver中写数据后,Binder驱动首先会判断当前命令接收方是Service Manager还是普通的Server端,判断依据是tr->target.handle.if(tr->target.handle == 0)   表示该命令是发送特殊结点,即Service Manager,而else  针对一般情况,我们需要判断Binder驱动中有没有对应的结点引用,正常情况下应该是能够找到handle对应的Binder结点引用的。通过结点引用,我们就可以定位到处理命令的Binder结点(实体结点)。

在上面的writeTransactionData中,tr->target.handle == 0,故Service Manager进程会收到BR_TRANSACTION命令,Service Manager在处理完命令后,会把结果通过BC_REPLY消息写回Binder驱动,使得上面的waitForResponse(存在与Client进程中)可以得到BR_REPLY的response,从而完成一次交互。

接下来,我们先跳到Service_Manager.c中,来看看Service Manager进程是怎么处理BR_TRANSACTION命令的。

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
    struct binder_state *bs;
    void *svcmgr = BINDER_SERVICE_MANAGER;

    bs = binder_open(128*1024);

    if (binder_become_context_manager(bs)) {
        ALOGE("cannot become context manager (%s)\n", strerror(errno));
        return -1;
    }

    svcmgr_handle = svcmgr;
    binder_loop(bs, svcmgr_handler);
    return 0;
}

void binder_loop(struct binder_state *bs, binder_handler func)
{
    int res;
    struct binder_write_read bwr;
    unsigned readbuf[32];

    bwr.write_size = 0;
    bwr.write_consumed = 0;
    bwr.write_buffer = 0;
    
    readbuf[0] = BC_ENTER_LOOPER;
    binder_write(bs, readbuf, sizeof(unsigned));

    for (;;) {
        bwr.read_size = sizeof(readbuf);
        bwr.read_consumed = 0;
        bwr.read_buffer = (unsigned) readbuf;

        res = ioctl(bs->fd, BINDER_WRITE_READ, &bwr);

        if (res < 0) {
            ALOGE("binder_loop: ioctl failed (%s)\n", strerror(errno));
            break;
        }

        res = binder_parse(bs, 0, readbuf, bwr.read_consumed, func);
        if (res == 0) {
            ALOGE("binder_loop: unexpected reply?!\n");
            break;
        }
        if (res < 0) {
            ALOGE("binder_loop: io error %d %s\n", res, strerror(errno));
            break;
        }
    }
}

在主循环中,Service Manager进程不断的操作Binder驱动,读取到数据后,便调用binder_parse来处理。

int binder_parse(struct binder_state *bs, struct binder_io *bio,
                 uint32_t *ptr, uint32_t size, binder_handler func)
{
    int r = 1;
    uint32_t *end = ptr + (size / 4);

    while (ptr < end) {
        uint32_t cmd = *ptr++;
#if TRACE
        fprintf(stderr,"%s:\n", cmd_name(cmd));
#endif
        switch(cmd) {
		……
        case BR_TRANSACTION: {
            struct binder_txn *txn = (void *) ptr;
            if ((end - ptr) * sizeof(uint32_t) < sizeof(struct binder_txn)) {
                ALOGE("parse: txn too small!\n");
                return -1;
            }
            binder_dump_txn(txn);
            if (func) {
                unsigned rdata[256/4];
                struct binder_io msg;
                struct binder_io reply;
                int res;

                bio_init(&reply, rdata, sizeof(rdata), 4);
                bio_init_from_txn(&msg, txn);
                res = func(bs, txn, &msg, &reply);

				// 将结果写回Binder驱动
                binder_send_reply(bs, &reply, txn->data, res);
            }
            ptr += sizeof(*txn) / sizeof(uint32_t);
            break;
        }
        ……
        default:
            ALOGE("parse: OOPS %d\n", cmd);
            return -1;
        }
    }

    return r;
}

这里的func就是main里面的svcmgr,svcmgr函数用来处理各种命令,包括add_service和get_service等,处理完后,调用binder_send_reply将reply写回binder驱动,从而返回给其客户端进程。我们来看看svcmgr的实现。

int svcmgr_handler(struct binder_state *bs,
                   struct binder_txn *txn,
                   struct binder_io *msg,
                   struct binder_io *reply)
{
    struct svcinfo *si;
    uint16_t *s;
    unsigned len;
    void *ptr;
    uint32_t strict_policy;
    int allow_isolated;

//    ALOGI("target=%p code=%d pid=%d uid=%d\n",
//         txn->target, txn->code, txn->sender_pid, txn->sender_euid);

    if (txn->target != svcmgr_handle)
        return -1;

    // Equivalent to Parcel::enforceInterface(), reading the RPC
    // header with the strict mode policy mask and the interface name.
    // Note that we ignore the strict_policy and don't propagate it
    // further (since we do no outbound RPCs anyway).
    strict_policy = bio_get_uint32(msg);
    s = bio_get_string16(msg, &len);
    if ((len != (sizeof(svcmgr_id) / 2)) ||
        memcmp(svcmgr_id, s, sizeof(svcmgr_id))) {
        fprintf(stderr,"invalid id %s\n", str8(s));
        return -1;
    }

    switch(txn->code) {
    case SVC_MGR_GET_SERVICE:
    case SVC_MGR_CHECK_SERVICE:
        s = bio_get_string16(msg, &len);
        ptr = do_find_service(bs, s, len, txn->sender_euid);
        if (!ptr)
            break;
        bio_put_ref(reply, ptr);
        return 0;

    case SVC_MGR_ADD_SERVICE:
        s = bio_get_string16(msg, &len);
        ptr = bio_get_ref(msg);
        allow_isolated = bio_get_uint32(msg) ? 1 : 0;
        if (do_add_service(bs, s, len, ptr, txn->sender_euid, allow_isolated))
            return -1;
        break;

    case SVC_MGR_LIST_SERVICES: {
        unsigned n = bio_get_uint32(msg);

        si = svclist;
        while ((n-- > 0) && si)
            si = si->next;
        if (si) {
            bio_put_string16(reply, si->name);
            return 0;
        }
        return -1;
    }
    default:
        ALOGE("unknown code %d\n", txn->code);
        return -1;
    }

    bio_put_uint32(reply, 0);
    return 0;
}

是的,我们看到了SVC_MGR_CHECK_SERVICE,SVC_MGR_ADD_SERVICE等命令都最终在这里得到了妥善的处理。

OK,到这里,获取Service的整个流程就完了。

android binder 机制 (ServiceManager),布布扣,bubuko.com

android binder 机制 (ServiceManager)

标签:android   binder   service manager   binder机制   ipc   

原文地址:http://blog.csdn.net/super_dc/article/details/37738123

(0)
(0)
   
举报
评论 一句话评论(0
登录后才能评论!
© 2014 mamicode.com 版权所有  联系我们:gaon5@hotmail.com
迷上了代码!