标签:
今天写代码过程中,发现一个Double的变量通过new BigDecimal(Double d)转换为BigDecimal时,有效数字改变了,如下:
public class BigDecimalTest { public static void main(String[] arg) { String s1 = "123.45"; Double d1 = new Double(s1);
//使用String类型的形参构造BigDecimal BigDecimal bg1 = new BigDecimal(d1);
//使用Double类型的形参构造BigDecimal BigDecimal bg2 = new BigDecimal(s1); System.out.println("bg1 = "+bg1); System.out.println("bg2 = "+bg2); } }
输出:
bg1 = 123.4500000000000028421709430404007434844970703125
bg2 = 123.45
同样大小的Double数,以字符串形参的方式构造BigDecimal就能得到同样精度。而使用Double构造就会导致精度改变。事实上,按照官方API文档,推荐使用String形参的方式将float、double转换为BidDecimal,文档原文:For values other than float
and double
NaN and ±Infinity, this constructor is compatible with the values returned by Float.toString(float)
and Double.toString(double)
. This is generally the preferred way to convert a float
or double
into a BigDecimal, as it doesn‘t suffer from the unpredictability of the BigDecimal(double)
constructor。不止如此,还有以下情况:
public class BigDecimalTest { public static void main(String[] arg) { String s1 = "123.45"; String s2 = "123.450"; Double d1 = new Double(s1); Double d2 = new Double(s2); BigDecimal bg1 = new BigDecimal(s1); BigDecimal bg2 = new BigDecimal(s2); System.out.println("d1.equals(d2): "+d1.equals(d2)); System.out.println("bg1.equals(bg2): "+bg1.equals(bg2)); } }
Output:
d1.equals(d2): true
bg1.equals(bg2): false
同样大小的小数,有效数字不同情况下,Double类型的大小比较结果是相等的,符合我们的实际计算。但是分别转换成BigDecimal后再比较大小,得到不相等的结果。
标签:
原文地址:http://www.cnblogs.com/lauyu/p/5052800.html