码迷,mamicode.com
首页 > Windows程序 > 详细

Aspect Oriented Programming using Interceptors within Castle Windsor and ABP Framework AOP

时间:2016-06-20 20:17:47      阅读:496      评论:0      收藏:0      [点我收藏+]

标签:

http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/1080517/Aspect-Oriented-Programming-using-Interceptors-wit

Contents

Introduction

In this article, I‘ll show you how to create interceptors to implement AOP techniques. I‘ll use ASP.NET Boilerplate(ABP) as base application framework and Castle Windsor for the interception library. Most of the techniques described here are also valid for using Castle Windsor independent from ABP framework.

What is Aspect Oriented Programming (AOP) and Method Interception?

Wikipedia: "In computing, aspect-oriented programming (AOP) is a programming paradigm that aims toincrease modularity by allowing the separation of cross-cutting concerns. It does so by adding additional behavior to existing code (an advice) without modifying the code itself, instead separately specifying which code is modified via a "pointcut" specification".

In an application, we may have some repeating/similar code for logging, authorization, validation, exception handling and so on...

Manual Way (Without AOP)

An example code does all manually:

public class TaskAppService : ApplicationService
{
    private readonly IRepository<Task> _taskRepository;
    private readonly IPermissionChecker _permissionChecker;
    private readonly ILogger _logger;

    public TaskAppService(IRepository<Task> taskRepository, 
		IPermissionChecker permissionChecker, ILogger logger)
    {
        _taskRepository = taskRepository;
        _permissionChecker = permissionChecker;
        _logger = logger;
    }

    public void CreateTask(CreateTaskInput input)
    {
        _logger.Debug("Running CreateTask method: " + input.ToJsonString());

        try
        {
            if (input == null)
            {
                throw new ArgumentNullException("input");
            }

            if (!_permissionChecker.IsGranted("TaskCreationPermission"))
            {
                throw new Exception("No permission for this operation!");
            }

            _taskRepository.Insert(new Task(input.Title, input.Description, input.AssignedUserId));
        }
        catch (Exception ex)
        {
            _logger.Error(ex.Message, ex);
            throw;
        }

        _logger.Debug("CreateTask method is successfully completed!");
    }
}

In CreateTask method, the essential code is _taskRepository.Insert(...) method call. All other code is repeating code and will be the same/similar for our other methods of TaskAppService. In a real application, we will have many application service need the same functionality. Also, we may have other similar code for database connection open and close, audit logging and so on...

AOP Way

If we use AOP and interception techniques, TaskAppService could be written as shown below with the same functionality:

public class TaskAppService : ApplicationService
{
    private readonly IRepository<Task> _taskRepository;

    public TaskAppService(IRepository<Task> taskRepository)
    {
        _taskRepository = taskRepository;
    }

    [AbpAuthorize("TaskCreationPermission")]
    public void CreateTask(CreateTaskInput input)
    {
        _taskRepository.Insert(new Task(input.Title, input.Description, input.AssignedUserId));
    }
}

Now, it exactly does what is unique to CreateTask method. Exception handlingvalidation and logging code are completely removed since they are similar for other methods and can be centralized conventionally.Authorization code is replaced with AbpAuthorize attribute which is simpler to write and read.

Fortunately, all these and much more are automatically done by ABP framework. But, you may want to create some custom interception logic that is specific to your own application requirements. That‘s why I created this article.

About the Sample Project

I created a sample project from ABP startup templates (including module zero) and added to a Github repository.

Creating Interceptors

Let‘s begin with a simple interceptor that measures the execution duration of a method:

using System.Diagnostics;
using Castle.Core.Logging;
using Castle.DynamicProxy;

namespace InterceptionDemo.Interceptors
{
    public class MeasureDurationInterceptor : IInterceptor
    {
        private readonly ILogger _logger;

        public MeasureDurationInterceptor(ILogger logger)
        {
            _logger = logger;
        }

        public void Intercept(IInvocation invocation)
        {
            //Before method execution
            var stopwatch = Stopwatch.StartNew();

            //Executing the actual method
            invocation.Proceed();

            //After method execution
            stopwatch.Stop();
            _logger.InfoFormat(
                "{0} executed in {1} milliseconds.",
                invocation.MethodInvocationTarget.Name,
                stopwatch.Elapsed.TotalMilliseconds.ToString("0.000")
                );
        }
    }
}

An interceptor is a class that implements IInterceptor interface (of Castle Windsor). It defines the Interceptmethod which gets an IInvocation argument. With this invocation argument, we can investigate the executing method, method arguments, return value, method‘s declared class, assembly and much more. Intercept method is called whenever a registered method is called (see registration section below). Proceed() method executes the actual intercepted method. We can write code before and after the actual method execution, as shown in this example.

An Interceptor class can also inject its dependencies like other classes. In this example, we constructor-injected an ILogger to write method execution duration to the log.

Registering Interceptors

After we created an interceptor, we can register it for desired classes. For example, we may want to registerMeasureDurationInterceptor for all methods of all application service classes. We can easily identify application service classes since all application service classes implement IApplicationService in ABP framework.

There are some alternative ways of registering interceptors. But, it‘s most proper way in ABP to handleComponentRegistered event of Castle Windsors Kernel:

public static class MeasureDurationInterceptorRegistrar
{
    public static void Initialize(IKernel kernel)
    {
        kernel.ComponentRegistered += Kernel_ComponentRegistered;
    }

    private static void Kernel_ComponentRegistered(string key, IHandler handler)
    {
        if (typeof (IApplicationService).IsAssignableFrom(handler.ComponentModel.Implementation))
        {
            handler.ComponentModel.Interceptors.Add
            (new InterceptorReference(typeof(MeasureDurationInterceptor)));
        }
    }
}

In this way, whenever a class is registered to dependency injection system (IOC), we can handle the event, check if this class is one of those classes we want to intercept and add interceptor if so.

After creating such a registration code, we need to call the Initialize method from somewhere else. It‘s best to call it in PreInitialize event of your module (since classes are registered to IOC generally in Initializestep):

public class InterceptionDemoApplicationModule : AbpModule
{
    public override void PreInitialize()
    {
        MeasureDurationInterceptorRegistrar.Initialize(IocManager.IocContainer.Kernel);
    }

    //...
}

After these steps, I run and login to the application. Then, I check log file and see logs:

INFO 2016-02-23 14:59:28,611 [63 ] .Interceptors.MeasureDurationInterceptor - 
GetCurrentLoginInformations executed in 4,939 milliseconds.

Note: GetCurrentLoginInformations is a method of SessionAppService class. You can check it in source code, but it‘s not important since our interceptor does not know details of intercepted methods.

Intercepting Async Methods

Intercepting an async method is different than intercepting a sync method. For example,MeasureDurationInterceptor defined above does not work properly for async methods. Because, an async method immediately returns a Task and it‘s executed asynchronously. So, we can not measure when it‘s actually completed (Actually, the example GetCurrentLoginInformations above was also an async method and 4,939 ms was a wrong value).

Let‘s change MeasureDurationInterceptor to support async methods, then explain how we implemented it:

public class MeasureDurationAsyncInterceptor : IInterceptor
{
    private readonly ILogger _logger;

    public MeasureDurationAsyncInterceptor(ILogger logger)
    {
        _logger = logger;
    }

    public void Intercept(IInvocation invocation)
    {
        if (IsAsyncMethod(invocation.Method))
        {
            InterceptAsync(invocation);
        }
        else
        {
            InterceptSync(invocation);
        }
    }

    private void InterceptAsync(IInvocation invocation)
    {
        //Before method execution
        var stopwatch = Stopwatch.StartNew();

        //Calling the actual method, but execution has not been finished yet
        invocation.Proceed();

        //We should wait for finishing of the method execution
        ((Task) invocation.ReturnValue)
            .ContinueWith(task =>
            {
                //After method execution
                stopwatch.Stop();
                _logger.InfoFormat(
                    "MeasureDurationAsyncInterceptor: {0} executed in {1} milliseconds.",
                    invocation.MethodInvocationTarget.Name,
                    stopwatch.Elapsed.TotalMilliseconds.ToString("0.000")
                    );
            });
    }

    private void InterceptSync(IInvocation invocation)
    {
        //Before method execution
        var stopwatch = Stopwatch.StartNew();

        //Executing the actual method
        invocation.Proceed();

        //After method execution
        stopwatch.Stop();
        _logger.InfoFormat(
            "{0} executed in {1} milliseconds.",
            invocation.MethodInvocationTarget.Name,
            stopwatch.Elapsed.TotalMilliseconds.ToString("0.000")
            );
    }
    
    public static bool IsAsyncMethod(MethodInfo method)
    {
        return (
            method.ReturnType == typeof(Task) ||
            (method.ReturnType.IsGenericType && method.ReturnType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(Task<>))
            );
    }
}

Since sync and async execution logic is completely different, I checked if current method is async or sync (IsAsyncMethod does it). I moved previous code to InterceptSync method and introduced newInterceptAsync method. I used Task.ContinueWith(...) method to perform action after task complete.ContinueWith method works even if intercepted method throws exception.

Now, I‘m registering MeasureDurationAsyncInterceptor as a second interceptor for application services by modifying MeasureDurationInterceptorRegistrar defined above:

public static class MeasureDurationInterceptorRegistrar
{
    public static void Initialize(IKernel kernel)
    {
        kernel.ComponentRegistered += Kernel_ComponentRegistered;
    }

    private static void Kernel_ComponentRegistered(string key, IHandler handler)
    {
        if (typeof(IApplicationService).IsAssignableFrom(handler.ComponentModel.Implementation))
        {
            handler.ComponentModel.Interceptors.Add(new InterceptorReference(typeof(MeasureDurationInterceptor)));
            handler.ComponentModel.Interceptors.Add(new InterceptorReference(typeof(MeasureDurationAsyncInterceptor)));
        }
    }
}

If we run the application again, we will see that MeasureDurationAsyncInterceptor measured much more longer than MeasureDurationInterceptor , since it actually waits until method completely executed.

INFO  2016-03-01 10:29:07,592 [10   ] .Interceptors.MeasureDurationInterceptor - MeasureDurationInterceptor: GetCurrentLoginInformations executed in 4.964 milliseconds.
INFO  2016-03-01 10:29:07,693 [7    ] rceptors.MeasureDurationAsyncInterceptor - MeasureDurationAsyncInterceptor: GetCurrentLoginInformations executed in 104,994 milliseconds.

This way, we can properly intercept async methods to run code before and after. But, if our before and after code involve another async method calls, things get a bit complicated.

First of all, I could not find a way of executing async code before invocation.Proceed() . Because Castle Windsor does not support async naturally (other IOC managers also don‘t support as I know). So, if you need to run code before the actual method execution, do it synchronously. If you find a way of it, please share your solution as comment to this article.

We can execute async code after method execution. I changed InterceptAsync like that to support it:

public class MeasureDurationWithPostAsyncActionInterceptor : IInterceptor
{
    private readonly ILogger _logger;

    public MeasureDurationWithPostAsyncActionInterceptor(ILogger logger)
    {
        _logger = logger;
    }

    public void Intercept(IInvocation invocation)
    {
        if (IsAsyncMethod(invocation.Method))
        {
            InterceptAsync(invocation);
        }
        else
        {
            InterceptSync(invocation);
        }
    }

    private void InterceptAsync(IInvocation invocation)
    {
        //Before method execution
        var stopwatch = Stopwatch.StartNew();

        //Calling the actual method, but execution has not been finished yet
        invocation.Proceed();

        //Wait task execution and modify return value
        if (invocation.Method.ReturnType == typeof(Task))
        {
            invocation.ReturnValue = InternalAsyncHelper.AwaitTaskWithPostActionAndFinally(
                (Task) invocation.ReturnValue,
                async () => await TestActionAsync(invocation),
                ex =>
                {
                    LogExecutionTime(invocation, stopwatch);
                });
        }
        else //Task<TResult>
        {
            invocation.ReturnValue = InternalAsyncHelper.CallAwaitTaskWithPostActionAndFinallyAndGetResult(
                invocation.Method.ReturnType.GenericTypeArguments[0],
                invocation.ReturnValue,
                async () => await TestActionAsync(invocation),
                ex =>
                {
                    LogExecutionTime(invocation, stopwatch);
                });
        }
    }

    private void InterceptSync(IInvocation invocation)
    {
        //Before method execution
        var stopwatch = Stopwatch.StartNew();

        //Executing the actual method
        invocation.Proceed();

        //After method execution
        LogExecutionTime(invocation, stopwatch);
    }

    public static bool IsAsyncMethod(MethodInfo method)
    {
        return (
            method.ReturnType == typeof(Task) ||
            (method.ReturnType.IsGenericType && method.ReturnType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(Task<>))
            );
    }

    private async Task TestActionAsync(IInvocation invocation)
    {
        _logger.Info("Waiting after method execution for " + invocation.MethodInvocationTarget.Name);
        await Task.Delay(200); //Here, we can await another methods. This is just for test.
        _logger.Info("Waited after method execution for " + invocation.MethodInvocationTarget.Name);
    }

    private void LogExecutionTime(IInvocation invocation, Stopwatch stopwatch)
    {
        stopwatch.Stop();
        _logger.InfoFormat(
            "MeasureDurationWithPostAsyncActionInterceptor: {0} executed in {1} milliseconds.",
            invocation.MethodInvocationTarget.Name,
            stopwatch.Elapsed.TotalMilliseconds.ToString("0.000")
            );
    }
}

If we want to execute an async method after method execution, we should replace the return value with the second method‘s return value. I created a magical InternalAsyncHelper class to accomplish it.InternalAsyncHelper is shown below:

internal static class InternalAsyncHelper
{
    public static async Task AwaitTaskWithPostActionAndFinally(Task actualReturnValue, Func<Task> postAction, Action<Exception> finalAction)
    {
        Exception exception = null;

        try
        {
            await actualReturnValue;
            await postAction();
        }
        catch (Exception ex)
        {
            exception = ex;
            throw;
        }
        finally
        {
            finalAction(exception);
        }
    }

    public static async Task<T> AwaitTaskWithPostActionAndFinallyAndGetResult<T>(Task<T> actualReturnValue, Func<Task> postAction, Action<Exception> finalAction)
    {
        Exception exception = null;

        try
        {
            var result = await actualReturnValue;
            await postAction();
            return result;
        }
        catch (Exception ex)
        {
            exception = ex;
            throw;
        }
        finally
        {
            finalAction(exception);
        }
    }

    public static object CallAwaitTaskWithPostActionAndFinallyAndGetResult(Type taskReturnType, object actualReturnValue, Func<Task> action, Action<Exception> finalAction)
    {
        return typeof (InternalAsyncHelper)
            .GetMethod("AwaitTaskWithPostActionAndFinallyAndGetResult", BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Static)
            .MakeGenericMethod(taskReturnType)
            .Invoke(null, new object[] { actualReturnValue, action, finalAction });
    }
}

More

I will improve this article by adding some use cases:

  • Defining attributes to control interception logic
  • Working with method arguments
  • Manipulating return values
  • ...

While you can do all starting with the MeasureDurationInterceptor sample, follow updates of this article to get concrete examples.

Article History

  • 2016-03-01
    • Added async method interception sample.
  • 2016-02-23
    • Initial publication.

License

This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

Share

Aspect Oriented Programming using Interceptors within Castle Windsor and ABP Framework AOP

标签:

原文地址:http://www.cnblogs.com/shiningrise/p/5601494.html

(0)
(0)
   
举报
评论 一句话评论(0
登录后才能评论!
© 2014 mamicode.com 版权所有  联系我们:gaon5@hotmail.com
迷上了代码!