让我们向项目中再添加一个模块 print.js
:
project
webpack-demo
|- package.json
|- webpack.config.js
|- /dist
|- /src
|- index.js
+ |- print.js
|- /node_modules
print.js
+ export default function print(text) {
+ console.log(text);
+ };
src/index.js
import _ from ‘lodash‘;
+ import Print from ‘./print‘;
function component() {
var element = document.createElement(‘div‘);
// lodash 是由当前 script 脚本 import 导入进来的
element.innerHTML = _.join([‘Hello‘, ‘webpack‘], ‘ ‘);
+ element.onClick = Print.bind(null, ‘Hello webpack!‘);
return element;
}
document.body.appendChild(component());
再次运行构建,然后我们期望的是,只有 main
bundle 的 hash 发生变化,然而……
Hash: d38a06644fdbb898d795
Version: webpack 3.3.0
Time: 1445ms
Asset Size Chunks Chunk Names
vendor.a7561fb0e9a071baadb9.js 541 kB 0 [emitted] [big] vendor
main.b746e3eb72875af2caa9.js 1.22 kB 1 [emitted] main
runtime.1400d5af64fc1b7b3a45.js 5.85 kB 2 [emitted] runtime
index.html 352 bytes [emitted]
[1] ./src/index.js 421 bytes {1} [built]
[2] (webpack)/buildin/global.js 509 bytes {0} [built]
[3] (webpack)/buildin/module.js 517 bytes {0} [built]
[4] ./src/print.js 62 bytes {1} [built]
[5] multi lodash 28 bytes {0} [built]
+ 1 hidden module
……我们可以看到这三个文件的 hash 都变化了。这是因为每个 module.id
会基于默认的解析顺序(resolve order)进行增量。也就是说,当解析顺序发生变化,ID 也会随之改变。因此,简要概括:
main
bundle 会随着自身的新增内容的修改,而发生变化。vendor
bundle 会随着自身的module.id
的修改,而发生变化。runtime
bundle 会因为当前包含一个新模块的引用,而发生变化。
第一个和最后一个都是符合预期的行为 -- 而 vendor
的 hash 发生变化是我们要修复的。幸运的是,可以使用两个插件来解决这个问题。第一个插件是 NamedModulesPlugin
,将使用模块的路径,而不是数字标识符。虽然此插件有助于在开发过程中输出结果的可读性,然而执行时间会长一些。第二个选择是使用 HashedModuleIdsPlugin
,推荐用于生产环境构建:
webpack.config.js
const path = require(‘path‘);
const webpack = require(‘webpack‘);
const CleanWebpackPlugin = require(‘clean-webpack-plugin‘);
const HtmlWebpackPlugin = require(‘html-webpack-plugin‘);
module.exports = {
entry: {
main: ‘./src/index.js‘,
vendor: [
‘lodash‘
]
},
plugins: [
new CleanWebpackPlugin([‘dist‘]),
new HtmlWebpackPlugin({
title: ‘Caching‘
}),
+ new webpack.HashedModuleIdsPlugin(),
new webpack.optimize.CommonsChunkPlugin({
name: ‘vendor‘
}),
new webpack.optimize.CommonsChunkPlugin({
name: ‘runtime‘
})
],
output: {
filename: ‘[name].[contenthash].js‘,
path: path.resolve(__dirname, ‘dist‘)
}
};
现在,不管再添加任何新的本地依赖,对于每次构建,vendor
hash 都应该保持一致:
Hash: 1f49b42afb9a5acfbaff
Version: webpack 3.3.0
Time: 1372ms
Asset Size Chunks Chunk Names
vendor.eed6dcc3b30cfa138aaa.js 541 kB 0 [emitted] [big] vendor
main.d103ac311788fcb7e329.js 1.22 kB 1 [emitted] main
runtime.d2a6dc1ccece13f5a164.js 5.85 kB 2 [emitted] runtime
index.html 352 bytes [emitted]
[3Di9] ./src/print.js 62 bytes {1} [built]
[3IRH] (webpack)/buildin/module.js 517 bytes {0} [built]
[DuR2] (webpack)/buildin/global.js 509 bytes {0} [built]
[0] multi lodash 28 bytes {0} [built]
[lVK7] ./src/index.js 421 bytes {1} [built]
+ 1 hidden module
然后,修改我们的 src/index.js
,临时移除额外的依赖:
src/index.js
import _ from ‘lodash‘;
- import Print from ‘./print‘;
+ // import Print from ‘./print‘;
function component() {
var element = document.createElement(‘div‘);
// lodash 是由当前 script 脚本 import 导入进来的
element.innerHTML = _.join([‘Hello‘, ‘webpack‘], ‘ ‘);
- element.onClick = Print.bind(null, ‘Hello webpack!‘);
+ // element.onClick = Print.bind(null, ‘Hello webpack!‘);
return element;
}
document.body.appendChild(component());
最后,再次运行我们的构建:
Hash: 37e1358f135c0b992f72
Version: webpack 3.3.0
Time: 1557ms
Asset Size Chunks Chunk Names
vendor.eed6dcc3b30cfa138aaa.js 541 kB 0 [emitted] [big] vendor
main.fc7f38e648da79db2aba.js 891 bytes 1 [emitted] main
runtime.bb5820632fb66c3fb357.js 5.85 kB 2 [emitted] runtime
index.html 352 bytes [emitted]
[3IRH] (webpack)/buildin/module.js 517 bytes {0} [built]
[DuR2] (webpack)/buildin/global.js 509 bytes {0} [built]
[0] multi lodash 28 bytes {0} [built]
[lVK7] ./src/index.js 427 bytes {1} [built]
+ 1 hidden module
我们可以看到,这两次构建中,vendor
bundle 的文件名称,都是 eed6dcc3b30cfa138aaa
。