Why am I getting an error converting a Foo** → const Foo**?

标签：

Because converting Foo** → const Foo** would be invalid and dangerous.

C++ allows the (safe) conversion Foo* → Foo const*, but gives an error if you try to implicitly convert Foo** → const Foo**.

The rationale for why that error is a good thing is given below. But first, here is the most common solution: simply change const Foo** to const Foo* const*:

1. class Foo { /* ... */ };
3. void f(const Foo** p);
4. void g(const Foo* const* p);
6. int main()
7. {
8. Foo** p = /*...*/;
9. // ...
10. f(p); // ERROR: it‘s illegal and immoral to convert Foo** to const Foo**
11. g(p); // Okay: it‘s legal and moral to convert Foo** to const Foo* const*
12. // ...
13. }

The reason the conversion from Foo** → const Foo** is dangerous is that it would let you silently and accidentally modify a const Foo object without a cast:

1. class Foo {
2. public:
3. void modify(); // make some modification to the this object
4. };
6. int main()
7. {
8. const Foo x;
9. Foo* p;
10. const Foo** q = &p; // q now points to p; this is (fortunately!) an error
11. *q = &x; // p now points to x
12. p->modify(); // Ouch: modifies a const Foo!!
13. // ...
14. }

If the q = &p line were legal, q would be pointing at p. The next line, *q = &x, changes p itself (since *q is p) to point at x. That would be a bad thing, since we would have lost the const qualifier: p is a Foo* but x is a const Foo. The p->modify() line exploits p’s ability to modify its referent, which is the real problem, since we ended up modifying a const Foo.

By way of analogy, if you hide a criminal under a lawful disguise, he can then exploit the trust given to that disguise. That’s bad.

Why am I getting an error converting a Foo** → const Foo**?

标签：

原文地址：http://www.cnblogs.com/hustxujinkang/p/5064050.html