标签:
Our module is coming along nicely. However, we‘re not really doing all that much yet; to be precise, all we do is display all blog entries on one page. In this chapter, you will learn everything you need to know about the Router
in order to route to controllers and actions for displaying a single blog post, adding a new blog post, editing an existing post, and deleting a post.
Before we go into details on our application, let‘s take a look at the most often used route types.
As mentioned in a previous chapter, a literal route is one that exactly matches a specific string. Examples of URLs that can utilize literal routes include:
http://domain.com/blog
http://domain.com/blog/add
http://domain.com/about-me
http://domain.com/my/very/deep/page
http://domain.com/my/very/deep/page
Configuration for a literal route requires you to provide the path to match, and the "defaults" to return on a match. The "defaults" are then returned as route match parameters; one use case for these is to specify the controller to invoke and the action method on that controller to use. As an example:
‘router‘ => [
‘routes‘ => [
‘about‘ => [
‘type‘ => ‘literal‘,
‘options‘ => [
‘route‘ => ‘/about-me‘,
‘defaults‘ => [
‘controller‘ => ‘AboutMeController‘,
‘action‘ => ‘aboutme‘,
],
],
],
],
],
Segment routes allow you to define routes with variable parameters; a common use case is for specifying an identifier in the path. Examples of URLs that might require segment routes include:
http://domain.com/blog/1
(parameter "1" is dynamic)http://domain.com/blog/details/1
(parameter "1" is dynamic)http://domain.com/blog/edit/1
(parameter "1" is dynamic)http://domain.com/blog/1/edit
(parameter "1" is dynamic)http://domain.com/news/archive/2014
(parameter "2014" is dynamic)http://domain.com/news/archive/2014/january
(parameter "2014" and "january" are dynamic)Configuring a segment route is similar to that of a literal route. The primary differences are:
:<varname>
segments, indicating items that will be dynamically filled. <varname>
should be a string, and will be used to identify the variable to return when routing is successful.[]
), and which can contain any mix of literal and variable segments internally.As an example, let‘s consider a route where we want to specify a variable "year" segment, and indicate that the segment must contain exactly four digits; when matched, we should use the ArchiveController
and its byYear
action:
‘router‘ => [
‘routes‘ => [
‘archives‘ => [
‘type‘ => ‘segment‘,
‘options‘ => [
‘route‘ => ‘/news/archive[/:year]‘,
‘defaults‘ => [
‘controller‘ => ArchiveController::class,
‘action‘ => ‘byYear‘,
‘year‘ => date(‘Y‘),
],
‘constraints‘ => [
‘year‘ => ‘\d{4}‘,
],
],
],
],
],
This configuration defines a route for a URL such as//example.com/news/archive/2014
. The route contains the variable segment:year
, which has a regex constraint defined as \d{4}
, indicating it will match if and only if it is exactly four digits. As such, the URL//example.com/news/archive/123
will fail to match, but//example.com/news/archive/1234
will.
The definition marks an optional segment, denoted by [/:year]
. This has a couple of implications. First, it means that we can also match:
//example.com/news/archive
//example.com/news/archive/
In both cases, we‘ll also still receive a value for the :year
segment, because we defined a default for it: the expression date(‘Y‘)
(returning the current year).
Segment routes allow you to dynamically match paths, and provide extensive capabilities for how you shape those paths, matching variable segments, and providing constraints for them.
When thinking about an entire application, you‘ll quickly realize that you may have many, many routes to define. When writing these routes you have two options:
A generic route is greedy, and will match as many URLs as possible. A common approach is to write a route that matches the controller and action:
‘router‘ => [
‘routes‘ => [
‘default‘ => [
‘type‘ => ‘segment‘,
‘options‘ => [
‘route‘ => ‘/[:controller[/:action]]‘,
‘defaults‘ => [
‘controller‘ => Application\Controller\IndexController::class,
‘action‘ => ‘index‘,
],
‘constraints‘ => [
‘controller‘ => ‘[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_-]*‘,
‘action‘ => ‘[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_-]*‘,
],
],
],
],
],
Let‘s take a closer look as to what has been defined in this configuration. Theroute
part now contains two optional parameters, controller
and action
. Theaction
parameter is optional only when the controller
parameter is present. Both have constraints that ensure they only allow strings that would be valid PHP class and method names.
The big advantage of this approach is the immense time you save when developing your application; one route, and then all you need to do is create controllers, add action methods to them, and they are immediately available.
The downsides are in the details.
In order for this to work, you will need to use aliases when defining your controllers, so that you can alias shorter names that omit namespaces to the fully qualified controller class names; this sets up the potential for collisions between different application modules which might define the same controller class names.
Second, matching nested optional segments, each with regular expression constraints, adds performance overhead to routing.
Third, such a route does not match any additional segments, constraining your controllers to omit dynamic route segments and instead rely on query string arguments for route parameters — which in turn leaves parameter validation to your controllers.
Finally, there is no guarantee that a valid match will result in a valid controller and action. As an example, if somebody requested//example.com/strange/nonExistent
, and no controller maps to strange
, or the controller has no nonExistentAction()
method, the application will use more cycles to discover and report the error condition than it would if routing had simply failed to match. This is both a performance and a security consideration, as an attacker could use this fact to launch a Denial of Service.
By now, you should be convinced that generic routes, while nice for prototyping, should likely be avoided. That means defining explicit routes.
Your initial approach might be to create one route for every permutation:
‘router‘ => [
‘routes‘ => [
‘news‘ => [
‘type‘ => ‘literal‘,
‘options‘ => [
‘route‘ => ‘/news‘,
‘defaults‘ => [
‘controller‘ => NewsController::class,
‘action‘ => ‘showAll‘,
],
],
],
‘news-archive‘ => [
‘type‘ => ‘segment‘,
‘options‘ => [
‘route‘ => ‘/news/archive[/:year]‘,
‘defaults‘ => [
‘controller‘ => NewsController::class,
‘action‘ => ‘archive‘,
],
‘constraints‘ => [
‘year‘ => ‘\d{4}‘,
],
],
],
‘news-single‘ => [
‘type‘ => ‘segment‘,
‘options‘ => [
‘route‘ => ‘/news/:id‘,
‘defaults‘ => [
‘controller‘ => NewsController::class,
‘action‘ => ‘detail‘,
],
‘constraints‘ => [
‘id‘ => ‘\d+‘,
],
],
],
],
],
Routing is done as a stack, meaning last in, first out (LIFO). The trick is to define your most general routes first, and your most specific routes last. In the example above, our most general route is a literal match against the path /news
. We then have two additional routes that are more specific, one matching/news/archive
(with an optional segment for the year), and another one matching /news/:id
. These exhibit a fair bit of repetition:
news-
./news
.Clearly, this can get tedious. Additionally, if you have many routes with repitition such as this, you need to pay special attention to the stack and possible route overlaps, as well as performance (if the stack becomes large).
To solve the problems detailed in the last section, zend-router allows defining "child routes". Child routes inherit inherit all options
from their respective parents; this means that if an option, such as the controller default, doesn‘t change, you do not need to redefine it.
Additionally, child routes match relative to the parent route. This provides several optimizations:
Let‘s take a look at a child routes configuration using the same example as above:
‘router‘ => [
‘routes‘ => [
‘news‘ => [
// First we define the basic options for the parent route:
‘type‘ => ‘literal‘,
‘options‘ => [
‘route‘ => ‘/news‘,
‘defaults‘ => [
‘controller‘ => NewsController::class,
‘action‘ => ‘showAll‘,
],
],
// The following allows "/news" to match on its own if no child
// routes match:
‘may_terminate‘ => true,
// Child routes begin:
‘child_routes‘ => [
‘archive‘ => [
‘type‘ => ‘segment‘,
‘options‘ => [
‘route‘ => ‘/archive[/:year]‘,
‘defaults‘ => [
‘action‘ => ‘archive‘,
],
‘constraints‘ => [
‘year‘ => ‘\d{4}‘,
],
],
],
‘single‘ => [
‘type‘ => ‘segment‘,
‘options‘ => [
‘route‘ => ‘/:id‘,
‘defaults‘ => [
‘action‘ => ‘detail‘,
],
‘constraints‘ => [
‘id‘ => ‘\d+‘,
],
],
],
],
],
],
],
At its most basic, we define a parent route as normal, and then add an additional key, child_routes
, which is normal routing configuration for additional routes to match if the parent route matches.
The may_terminate
configuration key is used to determine if the parent route is allowed to match on its own; in other words, if no child routes match, is the parent route a valid route match? The flag is false
by default; setting it to true
allows the parent to match on its own.
The child_routes
themselves look like standard routing at the top-level, and follow the same rules; they themselves can have child routes, too! The thing to remember is that any routing strings defined are relative to the parent. As such, the above definition allows matching any of the following:
/news
/news/archive
/news/archive/2014
/news/42
(If may_terminate
was set to false
, the first path above, /news
, would not match.)
You‘ll note that the child routes defined above do not specify a controller
default. Child routes inherit options from the parent, however, which means that, effectively, each of these will use the same controller as the parent!
The advantages to using child routes include:
The primary disadvantage is the verbosity of configuration.
Now that we know how to configure routes, let‘s first create a route to display only a single blog entry based on internal identifier. Given that ID is a variable parameter, we need a segment route. Furthermore, we know that the route will also match against the same /blog
path prefix, so we can define it as a child route of our existing route. Let‘s update our configuration:
// In module/Blog/config/module.config.php:
namespace Blog;
use Zend\ServiceManager\Factory\InvokableFactory;
return [
‘service_manager‘ => [ /* ... */ ],
‘controllers‘ => [ /* ... */ ],
‘router‘ => [
‘routes‘ => [
‘blog‘ => [
‘type‘ => ‘literal‘,
‘options‘ => [
‘route‘ => ‘/blog‘,
‘defaults‘ => [
‘controller‘ => Controller\ListController::class,
‘action‘ => ‘index‘,
],
],
‘may_terminate‘ => true,
‘child_routes‘ => [
‘detail‘ => [
‘type‘ => ‘segment‘,
‘options‘ => [
‘route‘ => ‘/:id‘,
‘defaults‘ => [
‘action‘ => ‘detail‘,
],
‘constraints‘ => [
‘id‘ => ‘[1-9]\d*‘,
],
],
],
],
],
],
],
‘view_manager‘ => [ /* ... */ ],
];
With this we have set up a new route that we use to display a single blog entry. The route defines a parameter, id
, which needs to be a sequence of 1 or more positive digits, not beginning with 0.
The route will call the same controller
as the parent route, but using thedetailAction()
method instead. Go to your browser and request the URLhttp://localhost:8080/blog/2
; you‘ll see the following error message:
A 404 error occurred
Page not found.
The requested controller was unable to dispatch the request.
Controller:
Blog\Controller\ListController
No Exception available
This is due to the fact that the controller tries to access the detailAction()
, which does not yet exist. We‘ll create this action now; go to yourListController
and add the following action, which will return an empty view model
// In module/Blog/src/Controller/ListController.php:
/* .. */
class ListController extends AbstractActionController
{
/* ... */
public function detailAction()
{
return new ViewModel();
}
}
Refresh your browser, which should result in the familiar message that a template was unable to be rendered.
Let‘s create this template now and assume that we will get a Post
instance passed to the template to see the details of our blog. Create a new view file under module/Blog/view/blog/list/detail.phtml
:
<h1>Post Details</h1>
<dl>
<dt>Post Title</dt>
<dd><?= $this->escapeHtml($this->post->getTitle()) ?></dd>
<dt>Post Text</dt>
<dd><?= $this->escapeHtml($this->post->getText()) ?></dd>
</dl>
The above template is expecting a $post
variable referencing a Post
instance in the view model. We‘ll now update the ListController
to provide that:
public function detailAction()
{
$id = $this->params()->fromRoute(‘id‘);
return new ViewModel([
‘post‘ => $this->postRepository->findPost($id)
]);
}
If you refresh your application now, you‘ll see the details for our Post
are displayed. However, there is one problem with what we have done: while we have our repository set up to throw an InvalidArgumentException
when no post is found matching a given identifier, we do not check for it in our controller.
Go to your browser and open the URL http://localhost:8080/blog/99
; you will see the following error message:
An error occurred
An error occurred during execution; please try again later.
Additional information:
InvalidArgumentException
File:
{projectPath}/module/Blog/src/Model/ZendDbSqlRepository.php:{lineNumber}
Message:
Blog post with identifier "99" not found.
This is kind of ugly, so our ListController
should be prepared to do something whenever an InvalidArgumentException
is thrown by the PostService
. Let‘s have the controller redirect to the blog post overview.
First, add a new import to the ListController
class file:
use InvalidArgumentException;
Now add the following try-catch statement to the detailAction()
method:
public function detailAction()
{
$id = $this->params()->fromRoute(‘id‘);
try {
$post = $this->postService->findPost($id);
} catch (\InvalidArgumentException $ex) {
return $this->redirect()->toRoute(‘blog‘);
}
return new ViewModel(array(
‘post‘ => $post
));
}
Now whenever a user requests an invalid identifier, you‘ll be redirected to the route blog
, which is our list of blog posts!
标签:
原文地址:http://www.cnblogs.com/chunguang/p/5642792.html