标签:rtu span 使用 ++ title 调用次数 输出 之间 代码
软件的性能是软件质量的重要考察点,不论是在线服务程序还是离线程序,甚至是终端应用,性能都是用户体验的关键。这里说的性能重大的范畴来讲包括了性能和稳定性两个方面,我们在做软件测试的时候也是要重点测试版本的性能表现和稳定性的。对于软件测试过程中发现的性能问题,如何定位有很多的方法。基本的方法可能是开发者对代码进行review,或者是使用一些工具对代码进行性能分析。常见的性能分析tuning工具有哪些呢?下面两篇文章做了详细的总结:
gprof能够让你知道你的代码哪些地方是比较耗时的,哪些函数是被调用次数很多的,并且能够让你一目了然的看到函数与函数之间的调用关系。gprof是gcc/g++编译器支持的一种性能诊断工具。只要在编译时加上-pg选项,编译器就会在编译程序时在每个函数的开头加一个mcount函数调用,在每一个函数调用之前都会先调用这个mcount函数,在mcount中会保存函数的调用关系图和函数的调用时间和被调次数等信息。最终在程序退出时保存在gmon.out文件中,需要注意的是程序必须是正常退出或者通过exit调用退出,因为只要在exit()被调用时才会触发程序写gmon.out文件。
那么,gprof的使用方法主要以下三步:
#include<iostream> using namespace std; int add(int a, int b) { return a+b; } int sub(int a, int b) { return a-b; } int call () { std::cout << add(1,2) << std::endl; std::cout << sub(2,4) << std::endl; } int main() { int a=1, b=2; cout << add(a,b) << endl; for (int i=0; i<10000; i++) call(); return 0; }
g++ -o hello hello_grof.cpp -pg -g
得到可执行文件,我们可以使用readelf查看一下它的符号表里和没有-pg时编译的有啥不同:readelf -r ./hello和readelf -r ./hello_normal得出的结果对比。
左边为有-pg参数编译的结果。可以看出多了三个函数符号_mcount, __monstartup, _mcleanup都是和gprof相关的调用。
gprof -b ./hello gmon.out
Flat profile: Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds. no time accumulated % cumulative self self total time seconds seconds calls Ts/call Ts/call name 0.00 0.00 0.00 10001 0.00 0.00 add(int, int) 0.00 0.00 0.00 10000 0.00 0.00 sub(int, int) 0.00 0.00 0.00 10000 0.00 0.00 call() 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 global constructors keyed to _Z3addii 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) Call graph granularity: each sample hit covers 2 byte(s) no time propagated index % time self children called name 0.00 0.00 1/10001 main [7] 0.00 0.00 10000/10001 call() [10] [8] 0.0 0.00 0.00 10001 add(int, int) [8] ----------------------------------------------- 0.00 0.00 10000/10000 call() [10] [9] 0.0 0.00 0.00 10000 sub(int, int) [9] ----------------------------------------------- 0.00 0.00 10000/10000 main [7] [10] 0.0 0.00 0.00 10000 call() [10] 0.00 0.00 10000/10001 add(int, int) [8] 0.00 0.00 10000/10000 sub(int, int) [9] ----------------------------------------------- 0.00 0.00 1/1 __do_global_ctors_aux [13] [11] 0.0 0.00 0.00 1 global constructors keyed to _Z3addii [11] 0.00 0.00 1/1 __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) [12] ----------------------------------------------- 0.00 0.00 1/1 global constructors keyed to _Z3addii [11] [12] 0.0 0.00 0.00 1 __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) [12] ----------------------------------------------- Index by function name [11] global constructors keyed to _Z3addii (hello_grof.cpp) [9] sub(int, int) [10] call() [8] add(int, int) [12] __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) (hello_grof.cpp)
gprof -b ./hello gmon.out | gprof2doc.py > ~WWW/hello.dot
这部分内容可将gprof -b ./hello中的-b参数去掉,可以显示字段的详细含义描述:
14 % the percentage of the total running time of the 15 time program used by this function. 16 17 cumulative a running sum of the number of seconds accounted 18 seconds for by this function and those listed above it. 19 20 self the number of seconds accounted for by this 21 seconds function alone. This is the major sort for this 22 listing. 23 24 calls the number of times this function was invoked, if 25 this function is profiled, else blank. 26 27 self the average number of milliseconds spent in this 28 ms/call function per call, if this function is profiled, 29 else blank. 30 31 total the average number of milliseconds spent in this 32 ms/call function and its descendents per call, if this 33 function is profiled, else blank. 34 35 name the name of the function. This is the minor sort 36 for this listing. The index shows the location of 37 the function in the gprof listing. If the index is 38 in parenthesis it shows where it would appear in 39 the gprof listing if it were to be printed.
gprof是常见的性能分析工具,在此罗列一下它的一些不足,也是从网上看的:
标签:rtu span 使用 ++ title 调用次数 输出 之间 代码
原文地址:http://www.cnblogs.com/wlzy/p/7096063.html