标签:直接 assign tin 对比 least cond 贪婪法 ted oca
There are N children standing in a line. Each child is assigned a rating value.
You are giving candies to these children subjected to the following requirements:
* Each child must have at least one candy.
* Children with a higher rating get more candies than their neighbors.
What is the minimum candies you must give?
Example 1:
Input: [1,0,2]
Output: 5
Explanation: You can allocate to the first, second and third child with 2, 1, 2 candies respectively.
Example 2:
Input: [1,2,2]
Output: 4
Explanation: You can allocate to the first, second and third child with 1, 2, 1 candies respectively.
The third child gets 1 candy because it satisfies the above two conditions.
实现题(贪婪法)
1.给所有孩子一颗糖。
2.从左到右遍历,把当前分数和左边比,如果高了,比左边的糖多一颗。
3.从右到左遍历,把当前分数和右边比,如果高了,比右边的糖多一颗。
4.再扫一遍计数。
细节:
1.第三步的时候,如果要和右边比,一定要从右到左扫,不能从左到右扫。如果从左到右,因为你右边的对象还没有跟右边的右边的对象对比过,它的值都还不是确定的,你怎么能直接拿过来计算结果呢,错误。比如分数321,在和右边数对比的时候,从左到右扫就会是111->111->221错误,从右到左扫会是111->111->321正确
2.给所有孩子一颗糖有优雅点的写法: Arrays.fill(array, 1);
实现:
class Solution { public int candy(int[] ratings) { if (ratings == null || ratings.length == 0) { return 0; } int[] candies = new int[ratings.length]; // P2: 一个优雅的填充写法。 Arrays.fill(candies, 1); // for (int i = 0; i < candies.length; i++) { // candies[i] = 1; // } for (int i = 1; i < candies.length; i++) { if (ratings[i] > ratings[i - 1] && candies[i] <= candies[i - 1]) { candies[i] = candies[i- 1] + 1; } } // P1: 和右边的数字对比的时候,要从右到左遍历,否则会出错,比如321的孩子,在和右边数对比的时候,从左到右扫就会是111->111->221,从右到左扫会是111->111->321正确 for (int i = candies.length - 2; i >= 0; i--) { if (ratings[i] > ratings[i + 1] && candies[i] <= candies[i + 1]) { candies[i] = candies[i + 1] + 1; } } int ans = 0; for (int i = 0; i < candies.length; i++) { ans += candies[i]; } return ans; } }
标签:直接 assign tin 对比 least cond 贪婪法 ted oca
原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/jasminemzy/p/9654918.html