标签：not link 良好的 电子 ack ice 现象 认知 ret
From ancient times to the present, the "going back door" and "depending on the relationship" are endless. For example, we can see from the content of the recent Harvard University admissions discrimination case. There are many such phenomena in the information. For example, an applicant‘s family donated 1.1 million US dollars to Harvard University, which earned him the qualification to enter. In another email, a Harvard University Developer and Admissions Officer discussed how much they might squeeze from a candidate. Wrote in the mail. “(The donor) has a collection of art collections that can be imagined and may be given to us. But it is more likely to be sent to the museum.”
Obviously, the "going back door" behavior is wrong. But why are there so many people trying? It can be easily seen that walking the back door allows people to reduce their efforts and pay more for their relationship or money to achieve the same results as the short-term results of hard-working people, so that people feel that they can work harder than those who study diligently. Even better. We can also call these people "lazy people who are eager to get something for nothing." By walking the back door, people will not learn any knowledge, but instead will produce a self-good misconception. In the long run, not only can they not learn more knowledge, they will not pay more effort, but they will After retreating, after leaving this environment that can depend on relationships, people who walk the back door will leave the height of their peak in their lives. What‘s more, in many cases, going backdoors is linked to breaking the law!
From the above we can see that it is wrong to take the back door. This does not bring us any benefits. We should resist this kind of behavior of the back door, study hard and be serious.
从古至今，“走后门”“凭关系”的事情是层出不穷。比如说我们可以从近日哈佛大学招生歧视案的庭审内容中看出来。
资料中有很多这样的现象，比如一位申请人的家人向哈佛大学捐赠了110万美元，为他争取到了入学资格。还有一封电子邮件中，一名哈佛大学开发人员和招生主任讨论他们可能会从一名候选人身上榨取多少钱。邮件中写道。“（捐赠者）有一批艺术收藏品，可以想见，有可能会给我们。但更有可能是送去博物馆。”
另外还有很多人说，特朗普的女婿Jared Kushner学生时期虽然成绩平平，却被哈佛大学录取。这也许与他的父亲曾承诺向哈佛捐赠250万美元有关，又或许是招生办公室认为，“他才是最终为中东带来和平的天才。”
显然，“走后门”这种行为是不对的。然而为什么还有那么多的人去尝试呢？可以很容易看出，走后门可以让人们减少自己的努力多付出自己的关系或钱财从而达到与那些勤奋的人取得的短期成绩一样的结果，让人们觉得可以少努力而和那些勤奋学习的人一样甚至更好。我们也可以称这些人为“渴望不劳而获的懒汉”。通过走后门，人们并不会学到什么知识，反而会因此而产生出一种自我良好的错误认知，从长远来看，不仅不能学会更多知识、不会付出更多的努力，反而还会有退步、在离开了这种可以靠关系的环境以后，走后门的人将会离开自己人生中最巅峰的高度。更何况在很多情况下，走后门都是与违反法律相联结在一起的！
从上面我们可以看出，走后门是不对的，这样并不能为我们带来什么好处，我们应该抵制走后门的这种行为，努力学习，认真向上。
标签：not link 良好的 电子 ack ice 现象 认知 ret
原文地址：https://www.cnblogs.com/irischen/p/english-talking-pull-strings.html
