标签：gre result basic run mod sum nbsp confirm quick
原文：http://slacksite.com/other/ftp.html
中文翻译：http://www.phpweblog.net/killjin/archive/2008/01/06/2653.html
Contents:
One of the most commonly seen questions when dealing with firewalls andother Internet connectivity issues is the difference betweenactive and passive FTP and how best to support either or both ofthem. Hopefully the following text will help to clear up some of theconfusion over how to support FTP in a firewalled environment.
This may not be the definitive explanation, as the title claims, however, I‘ve heard enough good feedback and seen this document linked in enough places to know that quite a few people have found it to be useful. I am always looking for ways to improve things though, and if you find something that is not quite clear or needs more explanation, please let me know! Recent additions to this document include the examples of both active and passive command line FTP sessions. These session examples should help make things a bit clearer. They also provide a nice picture into what goes on behind the scenes during an FTP session. Now, on to the information...
FTP is a TCP based service exclusively. There is no UDP component toFTP. FTP is an unusual service in that it utilizes two ports, a ‘data‘ port and a ‘command‘ port (also known as the control port). Traditionallythese are port 21 for the command port and port 20 for the dataport. The confusion begins however, when we find that depending on themode, the data port is not always on port 20.
In active mode FTP the client connects from a random unprivilegedport (N > 1023) to the FTP server‘s command port, port 21. Then, theclient starts listening to port N+1 and sends the FTP command PORTN+1 to the FTP server. The server will then connect back to theclient‘s specified data port from its local data port, which is port 20.
From the server-side firewall‘s standpoint, to support active mode FTPthe following communication channels need to be opened:
When drawn out, the connection appears as follows:
In step 1, the client‘s command port contacts the server‘s command portand sends the command PORT 1027. The server then sends anACK back to the client‘s command port in step 2. In step 3 the serverinitiates a connection on its local data port to the data port the clientspecified earlier. Finally, the client sends an ACK back as shown in step4.
The main problem with active mode FTP actually falls on the clientside. The FTP client doesn‘t make the actual connection to the data portof the server--it simply tells the server what port it is listening on andthe server connects back to the specified port on the client. From theclient side firewall this appears to be an outside system initiating aconnection to an internal client--something that is usually blocked.
Below is an actual example of an active FTP session. The only things that have been changed are the server names, IP addresses, and user names. In this example an FTP session is initiated from testbox1.slacksite.com (192.168.150.80), a linux box running the standard FTP command line client, to testbox2.slacksite.com (192.168.150.90), a linux box running ProFTPd 1.2.2RC2. The debugging (-d) flag is used with the FTP client to show what is going on behind the scenes. Everything in red is the debugging output which shows the actual FTP commands being sent to the server and the responses generated from those commands. Normal server output is shown in black, and user input is in bold.
There are a few interesting things to consider about this dialog. Notice that when the PORT command is issued, it specifies a port on the client (192.168.150.80) system, rather than the server. We will see the opposite behavior when we use passive FTP. While we are on the subject, a quick note about the format of the PORT command. As you can see in the example below it is formatted as a series of six numbers separated by commas. The first four octets are the IP address while the last two octets comprise the port that will be used for the data connection. To find the actual port multiply the fifth octet by 256 and then add the sixth octet to the total. Thus in the example below the port number is ( (14*256) + 178), or 3762. A quick check with netstat should confirm this information.
testbox1: {/home/p-t/slacker/public_html} % ftp -d testbox2Connected to testbox2.slacksite.com.220 testbox2.slacksite.com FTP server ready.Name (testbox2:slacker): slacker---> USER slacker331 Password required for slacker.Password: TmpPass---> PASS XXXX230 User slacker logged in.---> SYST215 UNIX Type: L8Remote system type is UNIX.Using binary mode to transfer files.ftp> lsftp: setsockopt (ignored): Permission denied---> PORT 192,168,150,80,14,178200 PORT command successful.---> LIST150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for file list.drwx------ 3 slacker users 104 Jul 27 01:45 public_html226 Transfer complete.ftp> quit---> QUIT221 Goodbye.
In order to resolve the issue of the server initiating the connection tothe client a different method for FTP connections was developed. This wasknown as passive mode, or PASV, after the command used by theclient to tell the server it is in passive mode.
In passive mode FTP the client initiates both connections to the server,solving the problem of firewalls filtering the incoming data portconnection to the client from the server. When opening an FTP connection,the client opens two random unprivileged ports locally (N > 1023 andN+1). The first port contacts the server on port 21, but instead of thenissuing a PORT command and allowing the server to connectback to its data port, the client will issue the PASVcommand. The result of this is that the server then opens a randomunprivileged port (P > 1023) and sends P back to the client in response to the PASV command. The client then initiates the connection from portN+1 to port P on the server to transfer data.
From the server-side firewall‘s standpoint, to support passive mode FTPthe following communication channels need to be opened:
When drawn, a passive mode FTP connection looks like this:
In step 1, the client contacts the server on the command port and issuesthe PASV command. The server then replies in step 2 withPORT 2024, telling the client which port it is listening tofor the data connection. In step 3 the client then initiates the dataconnection from its data port to the specified server data port. Finally,the server sends back an ACK in step 4 to the client‘s data port.
While passive mode FTP solves many of the problems from the client side,it opens up a whole range of problems on the server side. The biggestissue is the need to allow any remote connection to high numbered ports onthe server. Fortunately, many FTP daemons, including the popular WU-FTPDallow the administrator to specify a range of ports which the FTP serverwill use. See Appendix 1 for more information.
The second issue involves supporting and troubleshooting clients which do (or do not) support passive mode. As an example, thecommand line FTP utility provided with Solaris does not support passivemode, necessitating a third-party FTP client, such as ncftp.
NOTE: This is no longer the case--use the -p option with the Solaris FTP client toenable passive mode!
With the massive popularity of the World Wide Web, many people prefer touse their web browser as an FTP client. Most browsers only supportpassive mode when accessing ftp:// URLs. This can either be good or baddepending on what the servers and firewalls are configured to support.
Below is an actual example of a passive FTP session. The only things that have been changed are the server names, IP addresses, and user names. In this example an FTP session is initiated from testbox1.slacksite.com (192.168.150.80), a linux box running the standard FTP command line client, to testbox2.slacksite.com (192.168.150.90), a linux box running ProFTPd 1.2.2RC2. The debugging (-d) flag is used with the FTP client to show what is going on behind the scenes. Everything in red is the debugging output which shows the actual FTP commands being sent to the server and the responses generated from those commands. Normal server output is shown in black, and user input is in bold.
Notice the difference in the PORT command in this example as opposed to the active FTP example. Here, we see a port being opened on the server (192.168.150.90) system, rather than the client. See the discussion about the format of the PORT command above, in the Active FTP Example section.
testbox1: {/home/p-t/slacker/public_html} % ftp -d testbox2Connected to testbox2.slacksite.com.220 testbox2.slacksite.com FTP server ready.Name (testbox2:slacker): slacker---> USER slacker331 Password required for slacker.Password: TmpPass---> PASS XXXX230 User slacker logged in.---> SYST215 UNIX Type: L8Remote system type is UNIX.Using binary mode to transfer files.ftp> passivePassive mode on.ftp> lsftp: setsockopt (ignored): Permission denied---> PASV227 Entering Passive Mode (192,168,150,90,195,149).---> LIST150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for file listdrwx------ 3 slacker users 104 Jul 27 01:45 public_html226 Transfer complete.ftp> quit---> QUIT221 Goodbye.
A reader, Maarten Sjouw, pointed out that active FTP will not function when used in conjunction with a client-side NAT (Network Address Translation) device which is not smart enough to alter the IP address info in FTP packets.
The following chart should help admins remember how each FTP mode works:
Active FTP :
command : client >1023 -> server 21
data : client >1023 <- server 20
Passive FTP :
command : client >1023 -> server 21
data : client >1024 -> server >1023
A quick summary of the pros and cons of active vs. passive FTP is also in order:
Active FTP is beneficial to the FTP server admin, but detrimental to the client side admin. The FTP server attempts to make connections to random high ports on the client, which would almost certainly be blocked by a firewall on the client side. Passive FTP is beneficial to the client, but detrimental to the FTP server admin. The client will make both connections to the server, but one of them will be to a random high port, which would almost certainly be blocked by a firewall on the server side.
Luckily, there is somewhat of a compromise. Since admins running FTP servers will need to make their servers accessible to the greatest number of clients, they will almost certainly need to support passive FTP. The exposure of high level ports on the server can be minimized by specifying a limited port range for the FTP server to use. Thus, everything except for this range of ports can be firewalled on the server side. While this doesn‘t eliminate all risk to the server, it decreases it tremendously. See Appendix 1 for more information.
An excellent reference on how various internet protocols work and theissues involved in firewalling them can be found in the O‘Reilly andAssociates book, Building Internet Firewalls, 2nd Ed, by BrentChapman and Elizabeth Zwicky.
Note 2012:This book is VERY old and the information contained therein may be outdated!
Finally, the definitive reference on FTP would be RFC 959, which sets forth the official specifications of the FTP protocol. RFCs can be downloaded from numerous locations, including http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc959.html.
Active FTP vs. Passive FTP, a Definitive Explanation
标签：gre result basic run mod sum nbsp confirm quick
原文地址：https://www.cnblogs.com/dingzk/p/12703625.html
