码迷,mamicode.com
首页 > 其他好文 > 详细

Jeremy Jaynes v. Va.

时间:2020-06-12 00:42:33      阅读:66      评论:0      收藏:0      [点我收藏+]

标签:important   car   pen   led   arm   basis   for   role   rem   

Jeremy Jaynes:

Virginia Case Virginia Court of Appeals 

JJ lived in North Carolina 

18.2 - 152.3:1

Bulk Unsolicited(adj. 未经请求的;主动提供的) Emails 

 

What happened?

Jeremy Jaynes was in North Carolina, spammed AOL emails with commercial stuff. Tried in Virginia because AOL servers located in Virginia + Long Arm Statute. Tried on the basis of the Anti-Spam statute.

 

Who won?

Virginia, but some charges were dropped

 

Why did they win?

Defendant tried free speech – didn’t work his speech was commercial. Defendant tried Virginia can’t charge me – didn’t work because of long arm.

Defended tries vague anti spam statute – court appealed because it prohibited all types of speech. There was a right to anonymous speech, which was prohibited by statute.

How did the witnesses play a role (how did they go back and forth in their argument)? Important terms:

Long Arm Statute

Jeremy Jaynes v. Va.

标签:important   car   pen   led   arm   basis   for   role   rem   

原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/JasperZhao/p/13096905.html

(0)
(0)
   
举报
评论 一句话评论(0
登录后才能评论!
© 2014 mamicode.com 版权所有  联系我们:gaon5@hotmail.com
迷上了代码!